The paper has stuff on the visual arts (painting,
photography, sculpture) almost every day but particularly on Fridays the arts coverage
has two separate exclusive sections. The one on the visual arts has added to my
knowledge of painters that I knew like Goya and Velázquez but it has also
helped me appreciate American artists like Homer, Eakins, Sargent and Hopper.
But there is more via ads on Mondays by M.S. Rau Antiques in New Orleans. Recently they had an ad for a splendid pair of Crimean
War British canon. This Monday's Kathy by John Kacere riveted my eyes. I now look forward every week to more from the New Orleans gallery.
The ad for this last week intrigued me and led me to
check out an artist I had never heard of, John Kacere. Perhaps since I don’t
have a formal art education this is why that is the case. The fact is that
Kacere’s bio and his output is strange but attractive to my eyes. In all my
photography of the female body I tended to avoid underwear (I don’t do lingerie).
My guess is that particularly in Vancouver (in spite of a
rapidly diminishing minority of puritanical Scots) a most conservative city,
where a contemporary version of Modigliani would be applying to employment
insurance (Is that Amedeo I spotted working at the Robson and Thurlow
Starbucks?) Kacere would horrify most arts patrons and connoisseurs. They would
find him tacky, almost pornographic. They would say he is objectifying women,
etc. (you know the drill)